Skip to main content

Why the CMA is taking action on leaseholds

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Consumer protection

Row of houses

Leasehold has long been a feature of home ownership in England and Wales. With a leasehold property you get to live in the home, and the land it is built on for a specified period. This period was often for as long as 999 years and in line with a set of rules (also known as clauses or covenants) set out in the lease.

A common feature seen in leasehold contracts involves the payment of ground rent to the freeholder; who is the outright owner of the building or ground that the home is on. Traditionally most, but not all, ground rents were referred to as ‘peppercorn’ due to them being small in size – usually around £50 per year.

Properties with long leaseholds and small levels of ground rent sometimes described as ‘virtual freehold’ properties. This is because you can buy and sell the rights just like a normal house without worrying about the lease expiring anytime soon. While the term ‘virtual freehold’ is incorrect (and potentially misleading), it does demonstrate how the owners of these long leasehold properties psychologically viewed their homes - as being 100% theirs.

Row of new build homes

Modern leasehold homes

In the early 2000’s, developers of new build properties started to engage in the practice of charging higher annual ground rents, many of which would increase as time passed. Sometimes these increases were in the form of doubling every 10 years. These developers also made 99 or 125 year leases the norm, making 999 year less common.

In many cases the developers created these leases as a commercial investment product and sold the right to receive ground rent to investors. These lease terms have been labelled by many as ‘onerous’ because of their negative effects on leaseholders.

To illustrate, here is how a property with a £250 per year ground rent doubling every 10 years would increase over time:

  • Year 1 - £250
  • Year 10 - £500
  • Year 20 - £1000
  • Year 30 - £2000
  • Year 40 - £4000
  • Year 50 - £8000

…and so on. For years these so-called ‘modern ground rents’ went largely under the radar until some mortgage lenders started refusing to lend where there were such lease terms. This meant leasehold owners, who had already paid a significant upfront amount, found themselves caught with spiralling on-going costs and unable to sell their homes.

Ground rents are not the only charges that homeowners may have to pay under their leases. Leasehold homeowners often must pay service charges, and even ‘permission fees’ should they wish to make basic improvements to the property.

We have seen numerous cases where these fees have run into thousands of pounds per year. The wide variety and high cost of these charges can often take homeowners by surprise and can leave them feeling vulnerable, frustrated and exploited in their own homes.

CMA’s recent action

In June 2019, after considering concerns expressed by MP’s, members of the public and campaign groups, the CMA decided to launch an investigation into the leasehold sector. Our focus was on ascertaining whether there had been breaches of consumer protection law. From this investigation we have identified these areas of concern:

  • Escalating ground rents
  • Potentially unfair sales practices
  • Service/permission charges
  • Lack of checks and balances – allowing problems to develop.

It is for these reasons that the CMA is now taking forward a number of actions, including opening enforcement cases in relation to potentially unfair lease terms and the potential mis-selling of leasehold properties, producing guidance for consumers on buying and owning leasehold properties and working with government on its plans to reform the leasehold market.

Our enforcement action, which involves Barratt Developments, Countryside Properties, Persimmon Homes and Taylor Wimpey, represents a significant moment for many leasehold homeowners who feel they have been mis-sold their properties and for those groups who have been campaigning for change.

We are not the only organisation active in the leasehold sector. Government and the Law Commission are both looking at ways to reform leasehold ownership that will help consumers in future. We will continue to work with them to bring about necessary change.

This announcement is one of a series of initiatives designed to help leaseholders now and in years to come.

Sharing and comments

Share this page


  1. Comment by Bob McMenemie posted on

    I think that leasehold tenure in the case of residential houses at least has only been set up for the sole purpose of exploiting the leaseholder for monetary gain, this exploitation is blatantly displayed by many freeholders as a commercial asset and does not provide any service for the leaseholder or indeed puts any responsibility on the freeholder with respect to the property.

    The companies which deal in these freeholds do so in large numbers as a business venture and many freeholders have no respect for the human rights of their victims.

    How can it be that a "Company" whose sole intent is to vehemently exploit the lone householder who does not have recourse to the legal advisers that a Company can afford is left to sort out the problems which these freeholders seem to relish handing out.

    It is a disgrace that a "Company" can deny what is obviously the human rights of an individual to have a secure home that he/she has paid for or is paying for.

    The legal profession should be ashamed that this thing has been made legal in Britain and the law should be altered so that a "Company" and I stress 'Company' should not have their human rights set above an actual 'human'.

    Every other country in world does not have this system of exploitation but here in Britain we have let landowners and those with great resources either in title or money or property take advantage of us simply because the ordinary British person just wants a peaceful existence, and this is how we have been paid back.

  2. Comment by Bridget Murphy posted on

    I welcome the news that Persimmon and Aviva have been persuaded by the CMA to sell freeholds for a fair price to leaseholders and to recompense leaseholders with doubling ground rents that have already risen, if they still own the property.

    Does this only apply to ground rents that double? Even those that rise with RPI can become burdensome over time. Won't these leasehold houses and flats continue to be blighted, as future flats will have 0% ground rent and houses will almost all be freehold tenure?

    Will the CMA be able to persuade all developers to remove Rentcharges from freehold homes?

  3. Comment by David Rey posted on

    A bigger problem, in my view, are escalating service charges. These are often much higher than freehold charges. There needs to be more transparency - leaseholders are just presented with a figure that goes up sharply each year. I also think there should be a maximum service charge/property value % unless there are exceptional costs, in which case these exceptional costs should be clearly explained. Also, the accounts of service charge companies should be independently audited if they breach the above % rule.

  4. Comment by Caroline Wroe posted on

    We bought a new build from Barrats in 2008. The ground rent was then sold on to Simarc who has now more than doubled the ground rent to over £300 per year. It is daylight robbery & needs looking into as to why companies are allowed to exploit this with no explanation & reasoning. They want to charge us nearly £200 to ask how much it is to buy the leasehold - absolutely disgusting money grabbing charlatans.


Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person

By submitting a comment you understand it may be published on this public website. Please read our privacy notice to see how the GOV.UK blogging platform handles your information.